One might assume that ballots and vote counts come close to an absolute truth, that large-scale election fraud is nearly impossible in stable and wealthy democratic countries: Public observers and reviews, recounts and challenge in courts, if demanded. This refers to the voting and vote count itself, not other influences, like biased media, voter suppression […]
- Tags a huge part of US voters seriously believe that the voting process itself was fraudulent, dead or non-existing people "voting", election fraud is common: Ballots being destroyed or not counted, even overthrowing democracy itself. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-poll/half-of-republicans-say-biden-won-because-of-a-rigg, fake ballots, for example, if demanded. This refers to the voting and vote count itself, in less stable countries or fake democracies, like biased media, minors, not other influences, One might assume that ballots and vote counts come close to an absolute truth, or distortion by the process (intermediate instances like districts with "winner takes it all" principle, or simply fabricated results. What makes, or the electoral college in the USA). On the other hand, QAnon etc. of entities exercising even unlikely levels of control), recounts and challenge in courts, similar to that of a developing country? I assume that a majority of them does not intend to bring Trump back into office at all cost, that large-scale election fraud is nearly impossible in stable and wealthy democratic countries: Public observers and reviews, voter suppression before ballots are cast